Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Rugby Challenge Series
Rugby Challenge 3 confirmed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF C A Iversen" data-source="post: 768705" data-attributes="member: 12312"><p>That footage showed it to be just the same old stuff to me. I honestly think they need to not even think about release until the start of Super Rugby, but get it out week one or two of that. It'll be early enough that there'll still be the 6 Nations to promote it beside in the Northern Hemisphere. They need to produce something better than that same disorganised shambles of players standing any-old-where and floaty passes with butter-fingers style that they're straight out replicating from RC1 and RC2. Players don't look like hard men fastly thudding along a pitch in that. They look like they're slipping around on the surface!</p><p></p><p>I hope like heck that they've at least gotten rid of the myriad of bugs that crept into Rugby Challenge 2 in particular and sorted out the off-load craziness of both games.</p><p></p><p>I honestly believe that Tru Blu have given this to Wicked Witch for two reasons. Big Ant weren't willing to use the existing engine and assets and it sounds like they wanted to build a better game from almost scratch. Also, if Big Ant gets all the projects and Wicked Witch eventually went under, Tru Blu would only have Big Ant that they could deal with in Australasia and that would give too much negotiating power to Big Ant. </p><p></p><p>As for promotion, it's not so much down to Wicked Witch, that's Tru Blu's department. They can not feel confident about the work if they're saying and showing very little and putting it out quietly into public playtest to gauge reaction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF C A Iversen, post: 768705, member: 12312"] That footage showed it to be just the same old stuff to me. I honestly think they need to not even think about release until the start of Super Rugby, but get it out week one or two of that. It'll be early enough that there'll still be the 6 Nations to promote it beside in the Northern Hemisphere. They need to produce something better than that same disorganised shambles of players standing any-old-where and floaty passes with butter-fingers style that they're straight out replicating from RC1 and RC2. Players don't look like hard men fastly thudding along a pitch in that. They look like they're slipping around on the surface! I hope like heck that they've at least gotten rid of the myriad of bugs that crept into Rugby Challenge 2 in particular and sorted out the off-load craziness of both games. I honestly believe that Tru Blu have given this to Wicked Witch for two reasons. Big Ant weren't willing to use the existing engine and assets and it sounds like they wanted to build a better game from almost scratch. Also, if Big Ant gets all the projects and Wicked Witch eventually went under, Tru Blu would only have Big Ant that they could deal with in Australasia and that would give too much negotiating power to Big Ant. As for promotion, it's not so much down to Wicked Witch, that's Tru Blu's department. They can not feel confident about the work if they're saying and showing very little and putting it out quietly into public playtest to gauge reaction. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Rugby Challenge Series
Rugby Challenge 3 confirmed
Top