Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bada-Bing!" data-source="post: 1222616" data-attributes="member: 70552">Duty of care is with the cyclist to take care of the pedestrian per new hierarchy of road users rule of HW code. But there are lot of pedestrians who just step out though without even looking, presumably because of this new rule. But that only applies to junctions. Bound to be CCTV especially in City of London.If it was at a junction then he should have given way if she&#039;d started crossing. I find 99% of incidents can be avoided though just by the cyclists slowing down especially especially approaching such crossings and this is where you get cyclists weaving around pedestrians at low speed.But yeh physically assaulting a pedestrian is out of order. Hope the police sorted it out and charged the cyclist.I don&#039;t know if they caught this cyclist who they were seeking for head butting&nbsp; a pedestrian in London 5 years ago?[MEDIA=youtube]yH1PbV6IpOA[/MEDIA]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bada-Bing!, post: 1222616, member: 70552"] Duty of care is with the cyclist to take care of the pedestrian per new hierarchy of road users rule of HW code. But there are lot of pedestrians who just step out though without even looking, presumably because of this new rule. But that only applies to junctions. Bound to be CCTV especially in City of London. If it was at a junction then he should have given way if she'd started crossing. I find 99% of incidents can be avoided though just by the cyclists slowing down especially especially approaching such crossings and this is where you get cyclists weaving around pedestrians at low speed. But yeh physically assaulting a pedestrian is out of order. Hope the police sorted it out and charged the cyclist. I don't know if they caught this cyclist who they were seeking for head butting a pedestrian in London 5 years ago? [MEDIA=youtube]yH1PbV6IpOA[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]

Verification