Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 9: Highlanders v W.Force
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sanzar" data-source="post: 63384"><p>But only if they have a case to argue, and arguing often risks a longer stint if you fail, so it's a bloody good system really. As for Umaga and Mealamu not being cited, well that just proves how amature Rugby Union still is in this area! In League there is NO WAY IN HELL that dislocating a players should through a spear tackle COULD NOT get you cited... pathetic effort by part timer officials if you ask me and the system needs to be totally scrapped and replaced. The NRL knows what it's doing in this area, Rugby Union don't, it's as simple as that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sanzar, post: 63384"] But only if they have a case to argue, and arguing often risks a longer stint if you fail, so it's a bloody good system really. As for Umaga and Mealamu not being cited, well that just proves how amature Rugby Union still is in this area! In League there is NO WAY IN HELL that dislocating a players should through a spear tackle COULD NOT get you cited... pathetic effort by part timer officials if you ask me and the system needs to be totally scrapped and replaced. The NRL knows what it's doing in this area, Rugby Union don't, it's as simple as that. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 9: Highlanders v W.Force
Top