Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 11: W.Force v Crusaders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="esoj" data-source="post: 65716"><p>and you are telling me that a team that comes back from playing badly for most of the game and ends the 80mins stronger doesn't deserve to win. </p><p></p><p>so are you telling me that a team that can comes back from being behind and down for most of the game and claws their way back does not deserve to win.</p><p></p><p>should rugby games now only take into account the team that play better for 60mins of the game or even 40 mins. so a team making a comeback from a certain point in the game should be discarded as the other team deserved to win but not them.</p><p></p><p>it's a good thing rugby is 80mins eh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="esoj, post: 65716"] and you are telling me that a team that comes back from playing badly for most of the game and ends the 80mins stronger doesn't deserve to win. so are you telling me that a team that can comes back from being behind and down for most of the game and claws their way back does not deserve to win. should rugby games now only take into account the team that play better for 60mins of the game or even 40 mins. so a team making a comeback from a certain point in the game should be discarded as the other team deserved to win but not them. it's a good thing rugby is 80mins eh [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 11: W.Force v Crusaders
Top