Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Romain Poite's credibility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZeroTwo" data-source="post: 738123" data-attributes="member: 72695"><p>This. This SO much. The number of factors being excluded here is ridiculous. Calling someone biased (even subconsciously....) based on that limited number of samples is wrong. Statistically it's VERY likely that with the number of different refs, there will be a high level of statistical variance between them. It just is. We could have 10 robots who all perfectly refereed every game and you'd see similar statistics over such small numbers of tests.</p><p></p><p>Not saying that there is NO bias, just to claim so on these numbers is statistically invalid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZeroTwo, post: 738123, member: 72695"] This. This SO much. The number of factors being excluded here is ridiculous. Calling someone biased (even subconsciously....) based on that limited number of samples is wrong. Statistically it's VERY likely that with the number of different refs, there will be a high level of statistical variance between them. It just is. We could have 10 robots who all perfectly refereed every game and you'd see similar statistics over such small numbers of tests. Not saying that there is NO bias, just to claim so on these numbers is statistically invalid. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Romain Poite's credibility
Top