Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Featured
European Champions & Challenge Cup
Pool 1 (Glasgow, Leicester, Munster, Racing Metro)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smartcooky" data-source="post: 832701" data-attributes="member: 20605"><p>Without reading the whole thread, are you talking about the scenario where a player intentionally targets the knees of player standing in a tackle, or the knees of the plant foot of a player who has just kicked?</p><p></p><p>If so, there is no specific law that out Laws this. Rugby League calls it a "Cannonball Tackle" and it is illegal under their Laws. Recovering from a serious knee injury takes a long time. I have seen occasions when a cannonball tackle has ruled out a player for an entire season.</p><p></p><p><em>"A <strong>cannonball tackle</strong> occurs when a defender makes dangerous contact with the leg of an opponent who is already held in possession and deemed to be in a vulnerable position"</em> </p><p></p><p>However, in RU, there is Law 10.4 (e) </p><p></p><p>[TEXTAREA]10.4 (e) Dangerous tackling. A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or<strong> dangerously.</strong></p><p>Sanction: Penalty kick[/TEXTAREA]</p><p></p><p>Aside from the specific examples listed in that Law (stiff-arm, head high, early, late, without the ball etc) it is left open for the referee to interpret what he considers dangerous. Anything that I consider to be intent to injure I would rule as dangerous. Running shoulder-first directly into a player's knee (especially from front or side on) achieves nothing tactically that grabbing them around the ankles would not achieve, and IMO, can have no purpose other than to intentionally injure. I would penalise such a player for dangerous play. Any who don't agree, ask yourself if you would be OK with an opponent doing this to you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smartcooky, post: 832701, member: 20605"] Without reading the whole thread, are you talking about the scenario where a player intentionally targets the knees of player standing in a tackle, or the knees of the plant foot of a player who has just kicked? If so, there is no specific law that out Laws this. Rugby League calls it a "Cannonball Tackle" and it is illegal under their Laws. Recovering from a serious knee injury takes a long time. I have seen occasions when a cannonball tackle has ruled out a player for an entire season. [I]"A [B]cannonball tackle[/B] occurs when a defender makes dangerous contact with the leg of an opponent who is already held in possession and deemed to be in a vulnerable position"[/I] However, in RU, there is Law 10.4 (e) [TEXTAREA]10.4 (e) Dangerous tackling. A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or[B] dangerously.[/B] Sanction: Penalty kick[/TEXTAREA] Aside from the specific examples listed in that Law (stiff-arm, head high, early, late, without the ball etc) it is left open for the referee to interpret what he considers dangerous. Anything that I consider to be intent to injure I would rule as dangerous. Running shoulder-first directly into a player's knee (especially from front or side on) achieves nothing tactically that grabbing them around the ankles would not achieve, and IMO, can have no purpose other than to intentionally injure. I would penalise such a player for dangerous play. Any who don't agree, ask yourself if you would be OK with an opponent doing this to you. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Featured
European Champions & Challenge Cup
Pool 1 (Glasgow, Leicester, Munster, Racing Metro)
Top