Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Pichot on consistency and the Frank's incident.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smartcooky" data-source="post: 815490" data-attributes="member: 20605"><p>This is very frustrating. After all the explanations I have posted about citings, you <strong>still</strong> don't get it.</p><p></p><p>When a Citing Commissioner cites a player, he is in effect saying one of two things...</p><p></p><p>1. <em>"In my opinion, the player ought to have been red carded, and the referee was wrong not to have done so"</em>, or </p><p>2. <em>"The referee an/or other match official have missed seeing this player commit an infringement for which he ought to have received a red card"</em></p><p></p><p>This is not just my opinion, or me saying how I see it...<u><strong>these are facts!</strong></u></p><p><u><strong></strong></u></p><p>[TEXTAREA]WR Regulation 17.8 CITING</p><p>17.8.1 A citing arises where the duly appointed Citing Commissioner cites a Player for an act(s) of Foul Play in accordance with Regulation 17.9.1.</p><p></p><p>17.9.1 Citing Commissioners shall be entitled to cite a Player for any act(s) of Foul Play<strong> which in the opinion of the Citing Commissioner warranted the Player concerned being Ordered Off.</strong>[/TEXTAREA]</p><p></p><p>A player is <strong>not</strong>, repeat <strong>not</strong> cited merely for the purpose of having a butchers or sending some video to the Judiciary for a look-see. If you did that with every suspicious piece of play, the Judiciary would be in session 24/7/365 looking at video.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smartcooky, post: 815490, member: 20605"] This is very frustrating. After all the explanations I have posted about citings, you [B]still[/B] don't get it. When a Citing Commissioner cites a player, he is in effect saying one of two things... 1. [I]"In my opinion, the player ought to have been red carded, and the referee was wrong not to have done so"[/I], or 2. [I]"The referee an/or other match official have missed seeing this player commit an infringement for which he ought to have received a red card"[/I] This is not just my opinion, or me saying how I see it...[U][B]these are facts! [/B][/U] [TEXTAREA]WR Regulation 17.8 CITING 17.8.1 A citing arises where the duly appointed Citing Commissioner cites a Player for an act(s) of Foul Play in accordance with Regulation 17.9.1. 17.9.1 Citing Commissioners shall be entitled to cite a Player for any act(s) of Foul Play[B] which in the opinion of the Citing Commissioner warranted the Player concerned being Ordered Off.[/B][/TEXTAREA] A player is [B]not[/B], repeat [B]not[/B] cited merely for the purpose of having a butchers or sending some video to the Judiciary for a look-see. If you did that with every suspicious piece of play, the Judiciary would be in session 24/7/365 looking at video. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Pichot on consistency and the Frank's incident.
Top