Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Pichot on consistency and the Frank's incident.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Which Tyler" data-source="post: 815464" data-attributes="member: 73592"><p>Given that yo'ure outright wrong in your accusations of bias - it may just be that we haven't seen that footage.</p><p></p><p>If it does show what that one low-quality still photo appears to show, then he should have been cited, and probably banned as well. I'd need more evidence than a single still photo which doesn't look quite right (possibly relating to the highlighting) to condemn personally; but that should be pretty easy to find.</p><p></p><p>Watching through the video now - here's the vid at the right time stamp: <a href="https://youtu.be/rkuedXlKvck?t=23m38s" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/rkuedXlKvck?t=23m38s</a></p><p></p><p>ETA:</p><p>Contact is incidental, briefer than with Franks, once only; and the angle doesn't allow us to judge how close to the eyes it is. I'd need more angles before condemning.</p><p>Worth a citing though, so that it can be looked at properly, and an explanation received.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Which Tyler, post: 815464, member: 73592"] Given that yo'ure outright wrong in your accusations of bias - it may just be that we haven't seen that footage. If it does show what that one low-quality still photo appears to show, then he should have been cited, and probably banned as well. I'd need more evidence than a single still photo which doesn't look quite right (possibly relating to the highlighting) to condemn personally; but that should be pretty easy to find. Watching through the video now - here's the vid at the right time stamp: [url]https://youtu.be/rkuedXlKvck?t=23m38s[/url] ETA: Contact is incidental, briefer than with Franks, once only; and the angle doesn't allow us to judge how close to the eyes it is. I'd need more angles before condemning. Worth a citing though, so that it can be looked at properly, and an explanation received. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Pichot on consistency and the Frank's incident.
Top