Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Pichot on consistency and the Frank's incident.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Immenso" data-source="post: 815138" data-attributes="member: 74361"><p>I thought it looked terrible on initial viewing. Not a gouge from the head on view, though.</p><p>Link below, use of the word "facial" lets you know what the producers of The Breakdown think ....</p><p></p><p>Still don't think it should be legal to stop an opponent driving through a maul by pulling on his face .....</p><p></p><p>They'll probably change that now, because of the media mileage of the bad angles, and come up with a WR directive about duty of care whenever a hand goes near the face/eyes .... And some Welshman will get red carded in a World Cup semi final 7 years later due to 'the Franks Rule'</p><p></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/Mk4klCK4f_o" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/Mk4klCK4f_o</a></p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>The similarity to the Galarza incident is striking.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/MxfdU23uAUM" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/MxfdU23uAUM</a></p><p></p><p>Although not seen it front on.</p><p></p><p>Rentalick lost a contact lense in that incident, so contact with the eye was made. But yeah, looks accidental.</p><p>Galarza looks more accidental than Franks, with difference being Franks missed the eye but deliberately 'facialed' him in an attempt to stop him driving through. Where as Galarza has one big grab, unsighted, but makes contact with the eye.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Immenso, post: 815138, member: 74361"] I thought it looked terrible on initial viewing. Not a gouge from the head on view, though. Link below, use of the word "facial" lets you know what the producers of The Breakdown think .... Still don't think it should be legal to stop an opponent driving through a maul by pulling on his face ..... They'll probably change that now, because of the media mileage of the bad angles, and come up with a WR directive about duty of care whenever a hand goes near the face/eyes .... And some Welshman will get red carded in a World Cup semi final 7 years later due to 'the Franks Rule' [url]https://youtu.be/Mk4klCK4f_o[/url] [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] The similarity to the Galarza incident is striking. [url]https://youtu.be/MxfdU23uAUM[/url] Although not seen it front on. Rentalick lost a contact lense in that incident, so contact with the eye was made. But yeah, looks accidental. Galarza looks more accidental than Franks, with difference being Franks missed the eye but deliberately 'facialed' him in an attempt to stop him driving through. Where as Galarza has one big grab, unsighted, but makes contact with the eye. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
The Rugby Championship 2023
Pichot on consistency and the Frank's incident.
Top