Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Nation Eligibilty Catch-All Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 1098130" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>So what? I am 99% sure WR has the discretion to penalize unions if they deem so. Think of it as the 'Acts contrary to good sportsmanship.' law. They never define what good sportsmanship is but they do apply it when and if they see fit. </p><p>I find it unlikely, unfathomable that WR doesn't have a provision like that in their statutes. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. All crimes have statutes of limitation if and only if such statutes are directly or indirectly but explicitly stated. That doesn't appear to be the case here. </p><p>I used murder to exaggerate the point, but the logic stands. I didn't pick the argument, he did. I just applied his logic to something else to expose how those principles could very well end in disaster if applied blindly. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess we fundamentally disagree on what one could do then. I can think of a few examples of other nuts they could have tightened. </p><p>The fact they chose differently is another matter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 1098130, member: 55747"] So what? I am 99% sure WR has the discretion to penalize unions if they deem so. Think of it as the 'Acts contrary to good sportsmanship.' law. They never define what good sportsmanship is but they do apply it when and if they see fit. I find it unlikely, unfathomable that WR doesn't have a provision like that in their statutes. No. All crimes have statutes of limitation if and only if such statutes are directly or indirectly but explicitly stated. That doesn't appear to be the case here. I used murder to exaggerate the point, but the logic stands. I didn't pick the argument, he did. I just applied his logic to something else to expose how those principles could very well end in disaster if applied blindly. I guess we fundamentally disagree on what one could do then. I can think of a few examples of other nuts they could have tightened. The fact they chose differently is another matter. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Nation Eligibilty Catch-All Thread
Top