Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Nation Eligibilty Catch-All Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leonormous Boozer" data-source="post: 1073091" data-attributes="member: 45598"><p>I'm really struggling to see the issue. I guess you're saying that if 20s had binded him this wouldn't have been an option but had 20s binded him we have no idea who he'd have played for. Scotland rated him higher and swayed him with a better offer, not too much wrong with it in my view. </p><p></p><p>I didn't see an issue with England doing the same with Dan Kelly. (I see an issue with him wearing the shamrock and then the rose but only insofar as he personally totally lacks character and is sub-human) </p><p></p><p>If Nations were throwing increased match fees or benefits to dual qualified players over those who can only play for one nation I'd think it stinks but I don't think anyone is at that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leonormous Boozer, post: 1073091, member: 45598"] I'm really struggling to see the issue. I guess you're saying that if 20s had binded him this wouldn't have been an option but had 20s binded him we have no idea who he'd have played for. Scotland rated him higher and swayed him with a better offer, not too much wrong with it in my view. I didn't see an issue with England doing the same with Dan Kelly. (I see an issue with him wearing the shamrock and then the rose but only insofar as he personally totally lacks character and is sub-human) If Nations were throwing increased match fees or benefits to dual qualified players over those who can only play for one nation I'd think it stinks but I don't think anyone is at that. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Nation Eligibilty Catch-All Thread
Top