Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Tri Nations 2009-2011
Jake wants his job back, within the week.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smartcooky" data-source="post: 341249" data-attributes="member: 20605"><p>No you didn't. Here is the 2005 Table</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o35/smartcooky99/2005-3Ntable.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Without bonus points it would have finished</p><p></p><p>NZL 12 </p><p>SAF 12</p><p>AUS 0</p><p></p><p>But with a superior points difference (NZL +25 v SAF +11) New Zealand would have won the tournament anyway. </p><p></p><p>The next criteria is tries scored (NZL 12 v SAF 7) so they would have won on that count too even if the points had been the same.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smartcooky, post: 341249, member: 20605"] No you didn't. Here is the 2005 Table [IMG]http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o35/smartcooky99/2005-3Ntable.jpg[/IMG] Without bonus points it would have finished NZL 12 SAF 12 AUS 0 But with a superior points difference (NZL +25 v SAF +11) New Zealand would have won the tournament anyway. The next criteria is tries scored (NZL 12 v SAF 7) so they would have won on that count too even if the points had been the same. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Tri Nations 2009-2011
Jake wants his job back, within the week.
Top