S
shazbooger
Guest
Just reading through the details of the complaint against Intel and there is some pretty mad reading. A $1.25billion payment seems mickeymouse given the profits they have been posting over the years and those profits were posted on the back of poor practice. AMD's share price has jumped, but sure what Intels has done.
Anyhoo some of the juicy details;
Intel’s customers are constantly reminded where their primary loyalty should lie. For example, in March 2006, Intel’s CEO Paul Otellini received a courtesy “heads-up†from an HP executive that HP was sponsoring an advertisement featuring HP’s relationship with AMD and the theme of customer choice. Otellini reacted: “So, … why did you feel compelled to do this? It is certainly insulting to us and I do not see how it helps you…. If we are your key partner, this is nothing but a slap at us … I really don’t want to get in a ******* contest over this … But running an ad touting 10 years with amd [sic] and ‘choice’ is not the behavior of someon who wants to bring our two companies together.â€
Anyhoo some of the juicy details;
- Intel paid hundreds of millions â€" in some cases billions â€" of dollars in “rebates (bribes).†to OEM manufacturers to incentivise their continued exclusinve use of Intel chips.
- At the same time, Intel threatened OEMs with retaliation if they persisted in dealing with AMD
- The OEMs, struggling with narrow profit margins and fearing that Intel would retaliate by subsidizing their competitors to undersell them, often conformed to Intel’s demands. For example, in exchange for billions of dollars in rebate payments and other benefits, Dell agreed not to sell any AMD products from 2001 to 2006.
- HP Agreed (in exchange for threats and money) to limit their AMD sales to 5%.
- IBM agreed (in exchange for threats and money) to cancel one AMD branded project
Intel’s customers are constantly reminded where their primary loyalty should lie. For example, in March 2006, Intel’s CEO Paul Otellini received a courtesy “heads-up†from an HP executive that HP was sponsoring an advertisement featuring HP’s relationship with AMD and the theme of customer choice. Otellini reacted: “So, … why did you feel compelled to do this? It is certainly insulting to us and I do not see how it helps you…. If we are your key partner, this is nothing but a slap at us … I really don’t want to get in a ******* contest over this … But running an ad touting 10 years with amd [sic] and ‘choice’ is not the behavior of someon who wants to bring our two companies together.â€