Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TRF C A Iversen" data-source="post: 338935" data-attributes="member: 12312">I have some new info, courtesy of&nbsp; Radman, who has obtained a copy early! He is playing it now, what I&#039;ve been able to ascertain is that it&#039;s extremely good news.Firstly, players are much, much more responsive than they&#039;ve ever been.The game is fast.The attack and defensive capabilities of the AI are at the least very good.The game is playing fluidly and realistically, so far.Unsure of:Difficulty level he&#039;s playing at.How much this is new game excitement. All of this from a man who was prepared to go in with ground level expectations. From his responses so far, it seems like his expectations have not just slightly, but been massively exceeded. He&#039;s been rating it between 8.5 and 9.5 out of 10 so far! That could still place the game within the realms of 6-8 out of 10 though, if it&#039;s analysed more closely over time and more faults could be found.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TRF C A Iversen, post: 338935, member: 12312"] I have some new info, courtesy of Radman, who has obtained a copy early! He is playing it now, what I've been able to ascertain is that it's extremely good news. Firstly, players are much, much more responsive than they've ever been. The game is fast. The attack and defensive capabilities of the AI are at the least very good. The game is playing fluidly and realistically, so far. Unsure of: Difficulty level he's playing at. How much this is new game excitement. All of this from a man who was prepared to go in with ground level expectations. From his responses so far, it seems like his expectations have not just slightly, but been massively exceeded. He's been rating it between 8.5 and 9.5 out of 10 so far! That could still place the game within the realms of 6-8 out of 10 though, if it's analysed more closely over time and more faults could be found. [/QUOTE]

Verification