Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Game of Thrones Discussion [SPOILERS]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leonormous Boozer" data-source="post: 944521" data-attributes="member: 45598"><p>Accepting that the NK wasn't more than a subplot they had to do more with the throne. </p><p></p><p>What's really changed from S1 in that regard? </p><p>- Theres still a king, a hand, master of coin etc... </p><p>- At best the throne will be in good hands for one generation, then another fight is on. In all likelihood some **** would take advantage of a cripple and a dwarf being the king and hand to stage a revolution. Bran is also just a massively unsatisfactory king, his character was never about the seven kingdoms alone but rather all of Westeros, the children of the forest are toast and the old Gods will likely only fade from memory further. </p><p>- 99% of the population still don't matter a shite, I could go on. </p><p></p><p>Apart from Sansa declaring that the North will go their own way it's the same **** with different faces that we saw with Robert Barratheon and Ned Stark in season 1. </p><p></p><p>Ultimately I'd ask what was the show about? The Night King ended up being more or less nothing and good didn't exactly triumph bad, the corruptible system stayed in place and is as vulnerable as ever. A hell of a journey that never really went anywhere, some significant changes were required to make it any way satisfying imo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leonormous Boozer, post: 944521, member: 45598"] Accepting that the NK wasn't more than a subplot they had to do more with the throne. What's really changed from S1 in that regard? - Theres still a king, a hand, master of coin etc... - At best the throne will be in good hands for one generation, then another fight is on. In all likelihood some **** would take advantage of a cripple and a dwarf being the king and hand to stage a revolution. Bran is also just a massively unsatisfactory king, his character was never about the seven kingdoms alone but rather all of Westeros, the children of the forest are toast and the old Gods will likely only fade from memory further. - 99% of the population still don't matter a shite, I could go on. Apart from Sansa declaring that the North will go their own way it's the same **** with different faces that we saw with Robert Barratheon and Ned Stark in season 1. Ultimately I'd ask what was the show about? The Night King ended up being more or less nothing and good didn't exactly triumph bad, the corruptible system stayed in place and is as vulnerable as ever. A hell of a journey that never really went anywhere, some significant changes were required to make it any way satisfying imo. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Game of Thrones Discussion [SPOILERS]
Top