Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eot345" data-source="post: 380405" data-attributes="member: 42208">Bannahan ihas okay speed for a centre, certainly a bit quicker than tindall.again i agree Bannahan is not agile in any sense of the word but neither is tindall.I agree Bannahan is not very creative... neither is tindall.as for defense bannhan works well against big modern centres (for example he never would have been bumped off by rougarie like what happened in IR v FR )Both tindall and bannahan can be shown up by runner who has a good step.In conclusion:Crash ball:B&gt;THandleing:B=TSpeed:&nbsp;B&gt;Tcreativity:B=TOffloads:B&gt;TDefense:B=T(imo bannahan is a better defender than Tindall as J Guscott commented on Tindall&#039;s defensive weakness&#039;s, however i know some would disagree with this)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="eot345, post: 380405, member: 42208"] Bannahan ihas okay speed for a centre, certainly a bit quicker than tindall. again i agree Bannahan is not agile in any sense of the word but neither is tindall. I agree Bannahan is not very creative... neither is tindall. as for defense bannhan works well against big modern centres (for example he never would have been bumped off by rougarie like what happened in IR v FR ) Both tindall and bannahan can be shown up by runner who has a good step. In conclusion: Crash ball: B>T Handleing: B=T Speed: B>T creativity: B=T Offloads: B>T Defense: B=T (imo bannahan is a better defender than Tindall as J Guscott commented on Tindall's defensive weakness's, however i know some would disagree with this) [/QUOTE]

Verification