Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vieux Talonneur" data-source="post: 1222636" data-attributes="member: 73144">SB seems to have settled, at least for now, on 2 open sides at flanker, so surely it makes sense to continue that - we have plenty of options. Playing CCS at 6 changes the dynamic, unless SB&#039;s plan A all along was Chessum which he was prevented from seeing due to injury.I think CCS will mainly end up at 8 anyway. Let him fight that out with Willis.I like Barbeary&#039;s style a lot, but I&#039;ve never thought that he&#039;s really suited to the international game in the back row. Maybe he was just over hyped as a kid and there&#039;s nothing wrong in being a good club player. But can&#039;t help wondering if he&#039;s ever thought about changing position. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😀" title="Grinning face&nbsp; &nbsp; :grinning:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" data-shortname=":grinning:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vieux Talonneur, post: 1222636, member: 73144"] SB seems to have settled, at least for now, on 2 open sides at flanker, so surely it makes sense to continue that - we have plenty of options. Playing CCS at 6 changes the dynamic, unless SB’s plan A all along was Chessum which he was prevented from seeing due to injury. I think CCS will mainly end up at 8 anyway. Let him fight that out with Willis. I like Barbeary’s style a lot, but I’ve never thought that he’s really suited to the international game in the back row. Maybe he was just over hyped as a kid and there’s nothing wrong in being a good club player. But can’t help wondering if he’s ever thought about changing position. 😀 [/QUOTE]

Verification