Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Booboobang" data-source="post: 1205449" data-attributes="member: 86230">Thats not how CEO&#039;s work, ever. The CEO is there to make the most amount of profit regardless of personal or ethical cost for the shareholders. If there was room for 70 redundincies he would of done it without thinking. We already saw this mentality from him and the boardscwith things like setting financial sucess as record losses and combining womens and mens results. Look at out water situation, there was money to invest so we didnt have to have human **** in our water, was this done? No, instead larger and larger pay outs to shareholders. Energy bills through the roof yet there has been record profits and hand outs to shareholders. This is the reason grassroots will never get anything unless, like they are doing now they effectively go on &#039;strike&#039; and force change by being a pain for the board. We already kind of saw the lack of moral integrity by pumping disproportionate money into womens rugby knowing it is easier to maintain targets in that side of the game. I am all for funding in female rugby, but the tying result together makes it extrmely dubious as to why the RFU has been so hot on it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Booboobang, post: 1205449, member: 86230"] Thats not how CEO's work, ever. The CEO is there to make the most amount of profit regardless of personal or ethical cost for the shareholders. If there was room for 70 redundincies he would of done it without thinking. We already saw this mentality from him and the boardscwith things like setting financial sucess as record losses and combining womens and mens results. Look at out water situation, there was money to invest so we didnt have to have human **** in our water, was this done? No, instead larger and larger pay outs to shareholders. Energy bills through the roof yet there has been record profits and hand outs to shareholders. This is the reason grassroots will never get anything unless, like they are doing now they effectively go on 'strike' and force change by being a pain for the board. We already kind of saw the lack of moral integrity by pumping disproportionate money into womens rugby knowing it is easier to maintain targets in that side of the game. I am all for funding in female rugby, but the tying result together makes it extrmely dubious as to why the RFU has been so hot on it. [/QUOTE]

Verification