Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
England 2021/22
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BPM" data-source="post: 1052465" data-attributes="member: 59968"><p>I rate Chick, but I don't think it"s unfair to say he was anonymous against the USA. I agree that Ludlow and the locks weren't good (pretty sure Underhill was the other flanker BTW) but given the standard of the opposition, he had a good opportunity to shine and he didn't take it.</p><p></p><p>If Dombrandt's performance against Canada was a 7/10, I'd struggle to give Chick more than a 5 for the USA game. I'm not saying he was bad, but IMO, to rate above average. you need to be at least noticeable and he was invisible. Ludlow was visible, but more in a bad way and even more so vs. Canada.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BPM, post: 1052465, member: 59968"] I rate Chick, but I don’t think it”s unfair to say he was anonymous against the USA. I agree that Ludlow and the locks weren’t good (pretty sure Underhill was the other flanker BTW) but given the standard of the opposition, he had a good opportunity to shine and he didn’t take it. If Dombrandt’s performance against Canada was a 7/10, I’d struggle to give Chick more than a 5 for the USA game. I’m not saying he was bad, but IMO, to rate above average. you need to be at least noticeable and he was invisible. Ludlow was visible, but more in a bad way and even more so vs. Canada. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
England 2021/22
Top
