Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Eddie Jones ‘Consultant’ Role
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Every Time Ref" data-source="post: 948738" data-attributes="member: 71826"><p>I think it's idiotic to assume there is definitely something untoward going on, and (in a move that shocks no one) WOL have definitely thrown a **** ton of innuendo in alongside very few tangible details in order to rile up their base. No doubt there. And as a result there'll be some morons on the Welsh side (and probably other countries, because, y'know, it's the English...) spitting feathers and leaping to conclusions about what might well be an innocuous set of circumstances. And I really understand getting defensive because we English get an extraordinary amount of that crap from those sources.</p><p></p><p>But I also agree with bushytop that it is not reasonable to dismiss this as "there is absolutely nothing in this whatsoever". There could be. It's worth a conversation. It's reasonable to question what EJ's connection to the SGs is, and why they didn't disclose it. It looks potentially shady, and questions should be asked.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Every Time Ref, post: 948738, member: 71826"] I think it’s idiotic to assume there is definitely something untoward going on, and (in a move that shocks no one) WOL have definitely thrown a **** ton of innuendo in alongside very few tangible details in order to rile up their base. No doubt there. And as a result there’ll be some morons on the Welsh side (and probably other countries, because, y’know, it’s the English...) spitting feathers and leaping to conclusions about what might well be an innocuous set of circumstances. And I really understand getting defensive because we English get an extraordinary amount of that crap from those sources. But I also agree with bushytop that it is not reasonable to dismiss this as “there is absolutely nothing in this whatsoever”. There could be. It’s worth a conversation. It’s reasonable to question what EJ’s connection to the SGs is, and why they didn’t disclose it. It looks potentially shady, and questions should be asked. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Eddie Jones ‘Consultant’ Role
Top