Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Prestwick" data-source="post: 131471">Great, another person who believes in implementing Rugby League by stealth. And since when was it harder to score in the UK &quot;because it was always wet&quot;...*queue Lord of the Rings music*In a time of war.......in a time of conflict and mayhem......in a world of everlasting....rain.......there can be only one way of winning a game of rugby...Seriously mate, I&#039;d just stick with backing the &quot;fagger-roos&quot; or whatever you guys call your dive-ball team. Believe it or now, between 1898 and 1999 it wasn&#039;t always pouring down with rain in the British Isles. If it was, how come nations like Ireland, Wales and even Scotland &amp; England have produce some eclectic running styles in their time?EDIT: Basically, looking up at the vote bar there you can safely assume that the entire nation of Australia has voted there to cut it to one point and everyone else has voted to keep it as it is! :lol:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Prestwick, post: 131471"] Great, another person who believes in implementing Rugby League by stealth. And since when was it harder to score in the UK "because it was always wet"... *queue Lord of the Rings music* [i]In a time of war.... ...in a time of conflict and mayhem... ...in a world of everlasting....rain... ....there can be only [u][b]one way[/b][/u] of winning a game of rugby...[/i] Seriously mate, I'd just stick with backing the "fagger-roos" or whatever you guys call your dive-ball team. Believe it or now, between 1898 and 1999 it wasn't always pouring down with rain in the British Isles. If it was, how come nations like Ireland, Wales and even Scotland & England have produce some eclectic running styles in their time? EDIT: Basically, looking up at the vote bar there you can safely assume that the entire nation of Australia has voted there to cut it to one point and everyone else has voted to keep it as it is! :lol: [/QUOTE]

Verification