Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Changing of the laws?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smartcooky" data-source="post: 328791" data-attributes="member: 20605"><p>Everyone makes a few mistakes in grammar, but we don't just forget about it altogether!</p><p></p><p>Yes, I said "most" because I was being <u><strong>fair and honest</strong></u> about what they said. I could simply have said they ALL agreed, but that would have been a lie; one that would have been "safe" to tell too, because the boards are restricted (you need to hold a qualification before you are allowed access) so you would have had NO way of checking up on it.</p><p></p><p>For the record, I have had a total of 89 comments on the analyses over the four places I have submitted them. Only two disagreed, and only with part of them; one with #4, the other with #4 and #5. The one who disagreed with #5 thought Dickinson should have penalised Italy instead of resetting the scrum. His comment...</p><p></p><p>I hadn't spotted that myself, and did not include that in the analyses I posted here, because that would have meant altering it, which would again be dishonest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smartcooky, post: 328791, member: 20605"] Everyone makes a few mistakes in grammar, but we don't just forget about it altogether! Yes, I said "most" because I was being [U][B]fair and honest[/B][/U] about what they said. I could simply have said they ALL agreed, but that would have been a lie; one that would have been "safe" to tell too, because the boards are restricted (you need to hold a qualification before you are allowed access) so you would have had NO way of checking up on it. For the record, I have had a total of 89 comments on the analyses over the four places I have submitted them. Only two disagreed, and only with part of them; one with #4, the other with #4 and #5. The one who disagreed with #5 thought Dickinson should have penalised Italy instead of resetting the scrum. His comment... I hadn't spotted that myself, and did not include that in the analyses I posted here, because that would have meant altering it, which would again be dishonest. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Changing of the laws?
Top