Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dirty harry" data-source="post: 1222880" data-attributes="member: 86934">Except we are talking in context of &#039;incel&#039; types, who by their very nature don&#039;t have girlfriends to pimp out. Also 13 year old British boys have not been pimping out girls and become sex traffickers.I&#039;ve worked with maybe 120 male teens and early 20s in the last few years, and not 1 has done anything like this. The vast majority of crime occurred by teen boys are anti social behaviour, theft and property damage. These boys don&#039;t have the capability, awareness or skillset to pull off elaborate sex trafficking schemes, or manipulation. Infact most of these boys are far more at risk of being honey trapped and run into county lines.The few cases that could be linked to Tate style manipulation would be the honey trapping girls handlers, who are overwhelmingly NOT 13 year old white &#039;incel&#039; types.In my experience radicalisation doesn&#039;t happen to boys with fathers at home, and doesn&#039;t happen by social media view farmers, if we put radicalisation into teen males risk profile it&#039;s overwhelmingly by local gangs, exploiting a lack of support network, and desperation for survival.I&#039;ve never met a 13 year old perpetrator of any crime that wasn&#039;t victimised by people close to them first and foremost.The only reason the Tate issue irks me so much, is that we have such a high number of immediate risks to young boys and girls, pretending to be alpha males and treating others like lesser is the last of my priorities when risk assessing and setting strategical plans to produce behaviour change.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dirty harry, post: 1222880, member: 86934"] Except we are talking in context of 'incel' types, who by their very nature don't have girlfriends to pimp out. Also 13 year old British boys have not been pimping out girls and become sex traffickers. I've worked with maybe 120 male teens and early 20s in the last few years, and not 1 has done anything like this. The vast majority of crime occurred by teen boys are anti social behaviour, theft and property damage. These boys don't have the capability, awareness or skillset to pull off elaborate sex trafficking schemes, or manipulation. Infact most of these boys are far more at risk of being honey trapped and run into county lines. The few cases that could be linked to Tate style manipulation would be the honey trapping girls handlers, who are overwhelmingly NOT 13 year old white 'incel' types. In my experience radicalisation doesn't happen to boys with fathers at home, and doesn't happen by social media view farmers, if we put radicalisation into teen males risk profile it's overwhelmingly by local gangs, exploiting a lack of support network, and desperation for survival. I've never met a 13 year old perpetrator of any crime that wasn't victimised by people close to them first and foremost. The only reason the Tate issue irks me so much, is that we have such a high number of immediate risks to young boys and girls, pretending to be alpha males and treating others like lesser is the last of my priorities when risk assessing and setting strategical plans to produce behaviour change. [/QUOTE]

Verification