Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AlRums" data-source="post: 1223144" data-attributes="member: 75351">No, you said and I quote &quot;Interestingly, although I understand Trump must be popular in the USA, winning the presidency etc, I wasn&#039;t ready for what extent that was.&#039;I never said a single thing about new York at all, that&#039;s all you.Trump does nothing to remotely suggest &quot;to see nuance, regulate emotion or be intellectually honest&quot; is possible, to date, he has brow beaten his own people, and constantly threatened everybody else in the world. Should ww3 start I&#039;m pretty certain it will start as a result of his actions and nothing else.The stats I quoted are real figures, in that no republican, other than bush in 2004, since 1994 had more votes that opposing democrats. Democracy victories in that period have had more votes, therefore your &quot;vote minority that are standard for US presidents&quot; is incontrovertibly incorrect.I&#039;ll concede your 214 million if you wish, but it is a pointless number since it means nothing more than he&#039;s only modern president to run three times, although he had more votes than Harris, he has never been voted president by a majority of his country.Come back and engage when you have something useful or honest to say not attempt to be a wum all the time.Approval/Disapproval is an opinion poll, nothing there is fact just a generalisation. It is a fact that in those polls nearly every one, other than a couple of very republican biased poles, say exactly the same thing.vthatvtrumpbgas higher disapproval than approval.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AlRums, post: 1223144, member: 75351"] No, you said and I quote "[I]Interestingly, although I understand Trump must be popular in the USA, winning the presidency etc, I wasn't ready for what extent that was.'[/I] I never said a single thing about new York at all, that's all you. Trump does nothing to remotely suggest "to see nuance, regulate emotion or be intellectually honest" is possible, to date, he has brow beaten his own people, and constantly threatened everybody else in the world. Should ww3 start I'm pretty certain it will start as a result of his actions and nothing else. The stats I quoted are real figures, in that no republican, other than bush in 2004, since 1994 had more votes that opposing democrats. Democracy victories in that period have had more votes, therefore your "[I]vote minority that are standard for US presidents[/I]" is incontrovertibly incorrect. I'll concede your 214 million if you wish, but it is a pointless number since it means nothing more than he's only modern president to run three times, although he had more votes than Harris, he has never been voted president by a majority of his country. Come back and engage when you have something useful or honest to say not attempt to be a wum all the time. Approval/Disapproval is an opinion poll, nothing there is fact just a generalisation. It is a fact that in those polls nearly every one, other than a couple of very republican biased poles, say exactly the same thing.vthatvtrumpbgas higher disapproval than approval. [/QUOTE]

Verification