Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
A Political Thread pt. 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Reiser99" data-source="post: 1062478" data-attributes="member: 72977"><p>What are the rules for say if an MP owns a company? I'm curious because for me, banning working or consulting for any kind of commercial company would do it. Those are the jobs I think are wrong. Any job which basically amounts to lobbying. As you say being a doctor or barrister is different. Hell, tbh I don't mind Geoffrey Cox consulting as a lawyer, just as long as he's doing it in his own time and not in his office. The fact that he was in an online meeting and then got up to vote on something is atrocious though. If you're going to vote on something you should be there for the debate. That's a good example of interfering with their role as an MP. However, what if an MP owns a company. Clearly then they are biased, but they aren't technically being hired I guess. I'm trying to think of grey areas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Reiser99, post: 1062478, member: 72977"] What are the rules for say if an MP owns a company? I'm curious because for me, banning working or consulting for any kind of commercial company would do it. Those are the jobs I think are wrong. Any job which basically amounts to lobbying. As you say being a doctor or barrister is different. Hell, tbh I don't mind Geoffrey Cox consulting as a lawyer, just as long as he's doing it in his own time and not in his office. The fact that he was in an online meeting and then got up to vote on something is atrocious though. If you're going to vote on something you should be there for the debate. That's a good example of interfering with their role as an MP. However, what if an MP owns a company. Clearly then they are biased, but they aren't technically being hired I guess. I'm trying to think of grey areas. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
A Political Thread pt. 2
Top