Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dirty harry" data-source="post: 1218986" data-attributes="member: 86934">1. Again I havnt seen Gats comments. But when it comes to rugby analysis you cannot take periods of men missing as performance, it&#039;s not just about the missing player, it&#039;s about the other team playing a different style mostly conservative to manage the time. Either way our performance can&#039;t be judged against that accurately. 15 v 15 stats are very startling and definatlet in line with previous performances. 2. It&#039;s not that I&#039;m defending Gats, I stated a couple of times he probably needed replacing and new fresh blood included, and that he should&#039;ve gone after Howley. You however have this idea Gats was awful, and well it&#039;s not as simple as that. If the players aren&#039;t there, noone can make them beat top teams. 3. Young players who have hardly won any games are always going to praise the new coaching set up</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dirty harry, post: 1218986, member: 86934"] 1. Again I havnt seen Gats comments. But when it comes to rugby analysis you cannot take periods of men missing as performance, it's not just about the missing player, it's about the other team playing a different style mostly conservative to manage the time. Either way our performance can't be judged against that accurately. 15 v 15 stats are very startling and definatlet in line with previous performances. 2. It's not that I'm defending Gats, I stated a couple of times he probably needed replacing and new fresh blood included, and that he should've gone after Howley. You however have this idea Gats was awful, and well it's not as simple as that. If the players aren't there, noone can make them beat top teams. 3. Young players who have hardly won any games are always going to praise the new coaching set up [/QUOTE]

Verification