Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2017 Super Rugby] The FINAL: Lions vs. Crusaders (05/08/2017)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF_stormer2010" data-source="post: 868040" data-attributes="member: 39190"><p>That's still too 'Dutchy'. If I may split hairs it'd be "Sterkte is nie genoeg nie"; we've dropped the 't' and do the stupid double negative thing (blame the French Huguenots).</p><p></p><p>I agree with you RE Gardner. I'd have thought that to be set in stone after the (uncalled for IMO) outcry after the 'Canes capitulated. I know SANZAR are using local referees even in the finals as last year but assumed there was scope for change and I also in general prefer the appointment of neutral referees in an academic sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF_stormer2010, post: 868040, member: 39190"] That's still too 'Dutchy'. If I may split hairs it'd be "Sterkte is nie genoeg nie"; we've dropped the 't' and do the stupid double negative thing (blame the French Huguenots). I agree with you RE Gardner. I'd have thought that to be set in stone after the (uncalled for IMO) outcry after the 'Canes capitulated. I know SANZAR are using local referees even in the finals as last year but assumed there was scope for change and I also in general prefer the appointment of neutral referees in an academic sense. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2017 Super Rugby] The FINAL: Lions vs. Crusaders (05/08/2017)
Top