Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2016 Super Rugby] Jaguares vs. Sharks (Round 12) 14/05/2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF_stormer2010" data-source="post: 797727" data-attributes="member: 39190"><p>I think Creevy's tackle would be a difficult one to et out of as the evidence is right there from multiple angles. I agree there was no intent to harm on Creevy's part but the fact remains he had Deysel around the neck and the onus is on the tackler to release or pull out or bring safely to ground or whatever is required given the situation when there is a dangerous tackle/challenge situation.</p><p></p><p>I suspect they are chalengin the bite because its either impossible to prove or there is nothing in it in the first place which would not surprise me.</p><p></p><p>There were a few hands on opponent's faces during this match from both teams. Not that I think there's much in it or intent to go for the eyes from anyone. I just thought that if the citing commisioner is going over the footage with a fine comb there is more to cite than those two instances.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF_stormer2010, post: 797727, member: 39190"] I think Creevy's tackle would be a difficult one to et out of as the evidence is right there from multiple angles. I agree there was no intent to harm on Creevy's part but the fact remains he had Deysel around the neck and the onus is on the tackler to release or pull out or bring safely to ground or whatever is required given the situation when there is a dangerous tackle/challenge situation. I suspect they are chalengin the bite because its either impossible to prove or there is nothing in it in the first place which would not surprise me. There were a few hands on opponent's faces during this match from both teams. Not that I think there's much in it or intent to go for the eyes from anyone. I just thought that if the citing commisioner is going over the footage with a fine comb there is more to cite than those two instances. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
[2016 Super Rugby] Jaguares vs. Sharks (Round 12) 14/05/2016
Top