Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Tier Two & Three Rugby
2014 Canadian Rugby Championship and General Canadian Rugby Chat.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="canadafan" data-source="post: 676128" data-attributes="member: 69999"><p>Sinclair at lock is a decent Idea IMO, and one that should be considered based on how guys are going in other positions. Mackenzie is playing for the B side at Sale.</p><p></p><p>A group like that could be decent, IMO:</p><p></p><p>4. Cudmore</p><p>5. Sinclair</p><p>6. Blanchett/Gilmour</p><p>7. Moonlight</p><p>8. Ardron</p><p></p><p>Heaton or Pierce at 6 are also options. With all the 6s we have coming up, I am open to the idea of moving Sinclair to lock, especially since, none of our locks are really standing out IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="canadafan, post: 676128, member: 69999"] Sinclair at lock is a decent Idea IMO, and one that should be considered based on how guys are going in other positions. Mackenzie is playing for the B side at Sale. A group like that could be decent, IMO: 4. Cudmore 5. Sinclair 6. Blanchett/Gilmour 7. Moonlight 8. Ardron Heaton or Pierce at 6 are also options. With all the 6s we have coming up, I am open to the idea of moving Sinclair to lock, especially since, none of our locks are really standing out IMO. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Tier Two & Three Rugby
2014 Canadian Rugby Championship and General Canadian Rugby Chat.
Top
