• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

[2023 Six Nations] England vs Italy - 12 February 2023

TBH I'm not that fussed, just making a point to the 2 posters who have been whinging all game about how every decision has been going England's way when it clearly hasn't. I think the ref has been relatively even handed. There have been poor decisions both ways but no bias.
No you're just being a twat like last week
 
I always get a bit confused here.

I thought that, if tackled and held, you can't let go and go again (but the tackler might get pinged for not releasing... technically)
If tackled and not held, you can let go and go again.
If tackled let's go before completing, you don't even need to let go.

This case was definitely #1, but I'm never sure I'm right about what is or isn't allowed.
Similar here, it looked fine to me bar the knock on. Not entirely sure what else Varney can do when no ruck has been formed.
 
Similar here, it looked fine to me bar the knock on. Not entirely sure what else Varney can do when no ruck has been formed.
Barring the knock on...
If I've got it right, he needs to wait for the tackler to let go of him, or accept that his lack support has ****** him over and the ball gets turned over (or he hangs on, or does what he does, and hopes the ref lets him get away with it)
 
Similar here, it looked fine to me bar the knock on. Not entirely sure what else Varney can do when no ruck has been formed.
I guess if you take it to it's logical conclusion, imagine 2 players in isolation:
Player A tackles player B and there is no support for either. Player A then places the ball and lets go of it. To pick it up again they would need to get back to their feet and not obstruct the other player getting to the ball in the process before they regain possession, otherwise it's playing the ball on the ground or obstruction. The Italian player did neither and Earl was still holding him at the point he regathered the ball. I don't see how that can be deemed legal.
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top